Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: rename to rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links #14215

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 9, 2024

Conversation

weihanglo
Copy link
Member

Found in #14209 (comment).

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 9, 2024

r? @ehuss

rustbot has assigned @ehuss.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 9, 2024
@ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

ehuss commented Jul 9, 2024

Thanks!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 9, 2024

📌 Commit 7e78271 has been approved by ehuss

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 9, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 9, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 7e78271 with merge caf36ef...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 9, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: ehuss
Pushing caf36ef to master...

@bors bors merged commit caf36ef into rust-lang:master Jul 9, 2024
22 checks passed
@weihanglo weihanglo deleted the rustdoc branch July 9, 2024 14:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants